Parents often encounter “geographic restriction” in a custody dispute without fully understanding its impact. This legal rule limits where a child can live after a custody order. The Law Office of Ben Carrasco, PLLC, can help if you’re a Texas parent worried about relocation restrictions. We provide clarity and guidance to navigate this process effectively, ensuring you understand your rights and options. Contact us for expert legal support.
Contact a Family Law Lawyer in Austin
What is a Geographic Restriction?
A geographical restriction is a set of legal restrictions that limits access to a specific area or content based on location. This has certain limits, such as child custody, online media, or the sale and movement of value, even though these alter across jurisdictions. A geographic restriction in a Texas family law context is as it sounds: a child must legally live in certain counties based on a custody agreement and duties to both parents.
Such restrictions are common in other child custody cases because courts want to maintain strong parental relationships and prevent one parent from being too burdened if the other parent moves.
The reasoning is straightforward—when one parent moves a significant distance, the other may find it challenging to maintain consistent visitation, disrupting the child’s stability.
I will be handling your case at every step
Ben Carrasco
Geographic Restrictions on Child Custody
A geographic restriction typically in a child custody order restricts where a child may live. Courts put these restrictions in place so that both parents can work together to raise the child and ensure that the noncustodial parent can have visitation rights.
The restriction is generally limited to one county or a set of contiguous counties in Texas. For instance, a court order might state the child needs to live in Travis County or any bordering county.
This prevents one parent from moving to another state or a distant part of Texas without modifying the custody arrangement.
But things happen that change the picture. Work, family support, or personal reasons might force parents to move. If a parent wishes to go further away from the area, that parent has to apply to the court to change the order. Before granting permission, the court will ascertain if the relocation is in the child’s best interest. Following these rules provides stability for the child and allows the parent to remain a significant part of their life.
Contact a Family Law Lawyer in Austin
How Courts Evaluate Geographic Restrictions in Texas
Texas courts do not impose geographic limitations lightly. They assess a range of factors to measure necessity and scope. It also considers parental engagement, child stability, and proximity to family support. Such considerations help guarantee that decisions are made in the best interest of the child:
- Best Interests of the Child: The courts will always look out for the child’s best interests by providing a stable environment and giving the child time with both parents. A strong support system—extended family, school, community—dramatically influences the need for some kind of geographic restriction.
- Co-Parenting Dynamics: When parents actively participate in the child’s life and share responsibilities, courts usually place limitations to protect that relationship. However, if one parent has little to no involvement, courts may allow greater flexibility in relocation decisions, as limiting movement might not serve the child’s best interests.
- Basis for Relocation: On the other hand, courts may lift or adjust restrictions in cases where a parent needs to move for a legitimate purpose, like a job opportunity, proximity to family support, or a better education. But if the move looks like an effort to curtail the other parent’s access or interfere with custody arrangements, the court probably won’t approve the move.
- Visitation and Travel Logistics: Courts consider whether it is feasible for one parent to visit the children if the other parent moves. The court may keep geographic restrictions if the move would render visitation unreasonably expensive, time-consuming, or impractical because it is crucial that the non-custodial parent can maintain a meaningful relationship with the child.
Geographic limitations are not generalizations. One parent may ask for a modification if the factual circumstances change substantially. However, they must prove that changing or removing the restriction is in the child’s best interests. Courts closely scrutinize these requests to protect the child’s stability and health.
Need a Child Custody Lawyer in Austin? We Can Help
Custody disputes and geographic restrictions can be challenging to navigate, and it gets even more complicated when moving comes into play. Courts place these restrictions to keep both parents involved in their child’s life and to provide stability. Our skilled child custody lawyer in Austin at the Law Office of Ben Carrasco, PLLC, has the legal procedures and strategies necessary for your case. Contact us today at (512) 262-4574 to safeguard parental rights.
I am a seasoned Austin family law attorney with a practice focused on family law and business litigation. While most of my current practice focuses on family law, I also have experience litigating business disputes, including breach of contract, collections disputes, business torts, fiduciary liability, DTPA actions, fraud, and real estate litigation. Over 25 years of experience.Ben Carrasco